WordPress and Drupal are both powerful Content Management Systems (CMS’s) and two of the most popular ones in use today. There are several key differences between the two, and selecting the best fit has more to do with the specific goals and aims of a project than one being necessarily better than the other.
Both WordPress and Drupal are:
Open source content management systems built on the LAMP stack.
Shared functionality, plugins, themes, etc.
Regular events, support communities, trainings, and information/guides.
A robust long-term future; neither of them will be going anywhere anytime soon.
Ease of use & Complexity
Easy to install, requires little to no coding knowledge to get a site up and running.
Easy to install, requires more customization and configuration to set up.
Small learning curve.
Large learning curve, coding experience often needed.
Focus on blog and article content that displays on webpages. Pre-configured content types and functionality for quick publishing and easy static pages and articles.
Focus on interconnected content that can display in multiple places and push to other places on the web. Ability to create complex and customizable content types for advanced functionality of pages.
Solution oriented plugins that provide specific out of the box functions.
Functionality oriented modules meant to be combined with others to create needed functions.
Easy to start publishing content. Simple roles and workflows out of the box. Complex workflows are implemented via plugins like Edit Flow.
Focused on more-complex workflows with highly customized permissions and roles.
Third-party plugins can be prone to security vulnerabilities. For more information, see our blog post on WordPress Security.
Also has third-party vulnerabilities.
WordPress is a powerful and easy to use tool for creating content-oriented websites of all sizes. Drupal is similar to WordPress in many ways, however it is has a higher learning curve and requires more customization.
If you would like to learn more about WordPress or are a publisher considering a site migration from Drupal to WordPress, get in touch!
Be size “Large” or smaller from Popup Maker’s settings
Appear at the center of the bottom of the reader’s screen
Appear by sliding up from the bottom of the screen, over 350 milliseconds
Have an obvious “Close” button
Allow readers to interact with the rest of the page (do not use a full-page overlay)
Automatically open after 25 seconds (or more) on the page, because immediate popup appearances can be jarring. It can also be set to open after scrolling down a percentage of the page.
Be configured to not appear again for 2 weeks or more once dismissed by a reader
Be configured to not show on your donation page
You'll need to configure which pages the popup appears on, using the built-in conditionals feature. For disabling the popup on certain pages or in certain cases, read on in this blog post, or check out Popup Maker's paid extensions.
In addition to using Popup Maker themes, you can style popups using your site's WordPress theme's CSS, Jetpack’s Custom CSS Editor, or any other tool that allows you to define custom styles on your site.
What goes in a popup?
NewsMatch will provide calls to action, images, and gifs to be used leading up to and during the campaign.
I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect going into my first ever SRCCON, a two-day conference from the folks at OpenNews. The conference is designed to connect news technology and data teams in a hands-on, interactive series of workshops and conversations to address the practical challenges faced by newsrooms today. Leading up to the event, I had heard SRCCON described as “inclusive," “welcoming," and “supportive," which turned out to be an understatement!
As someone relatively new to the world of journalism conferences, and even more new to SRCCON, I was blown away at how many comfortable, friendly, and productive conversations were had before, during, and after the sessions each day. At every table at every meal, and at each session, nearby people took the time to introduce themselves and constantly made me feel welcome and included.
I loved the opportunity to meet people in person from many INN Member organizations and formed so many new connections with newsrooms far and wide. There is still so much to process from my two days there, but here’s a recap of some of my favorite sessions at SRCCON 2019:
Ghosts in the Machine - How technology is shaping our lives and how we can build a better way
I kicked off the conference by attending this session by facilitators Kaeti Hinck and Stacy-Marie Ishmael that focused on people-centered metrics and outcomes for newsrooms. We discussed issues with commonly-used metrics and brainstormed ways to make these metrics humane and collected in a way that respects people and humanity, rather than just the numbers.
My table discussed at length measuring retweets, shares, and other social engagement statistics and brainstormed ways we can improve these measurements by increasing education around what the statistics mean and considering sentiment behind shares when collecting data. Other tables discussed topics such as measuring changes in policy, comprehension of article content, truly engaging with readers using surveys and rewards for participation, and many other complex topics.
While finding solutions for these issues is challenging, these continued conversations around human-centered metrics and ethics around data collection are incredibly important as technology plays an increasingly important role in how we collect, define, and distribute news. I’m certain that this session wasn’t the end of these conversations, and I can’t wait to see where they go next.
Engineering Beyond Blame
Joe Hart and Vinessa Wan from the New York Times led this session introducing a collaborative method for discussing incidents and outages within today’s complex systems via blameless PostMortems called “Learning Reviews." They made the point that complex systems we work with today necessitate a need to prioritize learning opportunities over blame and punishment. The traditional idea of a single point of failure often doesn’t exist in complex systems where many factors can combine to lead to an incident or outage.
The goal of these “Learning Reviews” is to create a psychologically safe space where an honest and thorough investigation can happen to determine where the system or current team process failed, rather than on individual blame. They outlined how to create a defined process for these reviews, and then walked us through several small group exercises to demonstrate how complexity necessitates this approach. Here’s an article with more information about The Times Open Team’s approach and how they utilized it for Midterm election coverage.
What Happens to Journalism When AI Eats the World?
This was a fascinating and thought-provoking session led by Sarah Schmalbach and Ajay Chainani from the Lenfest Local Lab that examined the ethics behind the emerging field of AI, machine learning, and deep learning, and the effect these questions can have on the world around us.
We started with a group conversation about some of the AI horror stories we’ve heard about in the news or in our own lives, but then also discussed some of the groundbreaking AI work advancing journalism and helping make positive impacts on our world.
They then led us through a series of small group discussions where we came up with our own AI product and then evaluated it using common ethics standards from companies such as Microsoft and Google. The main takeaway was giving everyone in the room an ethical framework for evaluating AI news projects and the confidence to continue these discussions moving forward.
Thanks to Sarah and Ajay for leading such a deep and thought-provoking session!
Other highlights from the conference:
Brainstorming ways to explain complex topics in a very unique setting:
New to SRCCON for 2019 was the Science Fair, a chance to informally check out journalism tools and resources with interactive demos. Here’s INN’s Jonathan Kealing trying out a VR news story from the Los Angeles Times:
I chose to end the conference by witnessing a bit of friendly competition at “CMS Demos: Approaches to Helping Our Newsrooms Do Their Best Work." The demos featured a walkthrough of writing, editing, and publishing a news story from 5 different custom CMS platforms, along with some light-hearted competition and a lot of laughs. Included in the demos were:
Scoop, from the New York Times
Arc, from Washington Post
Chorus, from Vox
Copilot, from Condé Nast
Divesite, from Industry Dive
Overall, SRCCON 2019 exceeded my expectations as a first-time attendee, and was such an incredible opportunity to network, address important issues through interactive sessions, and have a ton of meaningful conversations with newsrooms from all over. Events like this remind us why we do the work we do with nonprofit newsrooms and inspire us to continue addressing the challenges faced by newsrooms today. Thanks so much to OpenNews and all the other sponsors, volunteers, and fellow attendees that made SRCCON 2019 possible!